HEADLINE: US Ambassador to India Garcetti's tenure marred by diplomacy gaffes, endangering strategic partnership

HEADLINE: US Ambassador to India Garcetti's tenure marred by diplomacy gaffes, endangering strategic partnership

Los Angeles, USA - The tenure of Eric Garcetti as the United States Ambassador to India has been marred by controversy, with the outgoing envoy facing criticism for his baffling statements, selective amnesia, and blatant disregard for India's legitimate concerns.

Garcetti's diplomatic efforts have been perceived as tone-deaf and irresponsible, particularly when it comes to addressing Khalistani extremism and the US's complicity in shielding them. His latest defence of the Biden administration's stance on Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, a leading Khalistani extremist operating openly in the United States, has raised eyebrows among experts.

In a podcast with journalist Smita Prakash, Garcetti asserted that in the United States, "you can't be punished for speech, only actions." This statement has been deemed as naive and downright dangerous by many, highlighting the need for more robust regulations on hate speech that threatens national security.

Pannun's rhetoric is clear: he has threatened the lives of Indian leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Chief Minister of Punjab, and others. Garcetti's assertion that the US is powerless to intervene unless Pannun directly acts on those threats ignores the fact that incitement to violence can lead to attacks on Indian diplomatic missions, terror threats, and general unrest.

Critics argue that Garcetti's pattern of downplaying serious threats posed by Khalistani extremists reveals a disturbing complacency when it comes to safeguarding innocent lives. His remarks signal a green light for extremist groups, indicating that the US is turning a blind eye to these threats even as they grow bolder.

India has long raised concerns about the safe havens provided to Khalistani extremists in the United States, and Garcetti's statements only seem to confirm these suspicions. The Union government has expressed its disappointment at the lack of cooperation from the US on this issue.

Garcetti's tenure has dealt a significant blow to the already fragile US-India strategic partnership. His diplomatic failures have not only undermined trust between the two nations but also exposed deep-seated differences in their foreign policy perspectives.

With the Republican administration likely returning to power in 2025, hopes for renewed diplomatic efforts with India are now brighter than ever. As an outgoing diplomat, Garcetti's future remains uncertain, although it is possible that he may return to politics when another Democratic administration takes office.

The sooner Garcia exits the diplomatic scene, the better for both India and the US.